Tensions are high in Elmina, Cape Coast, in the Central Region, as residents take to the streets to protest a salt mining lease granted to a private developer.
The demonstration, a sea of red with protestors carrying signs reading “We want our salt” and “Don’t sell Elmina,” reflects deep-seated concerns about transparency and community involvement in decisions impacting their livelihoods.
At the heart of the issue is the community’s claim that the traditional council, responsible for granting the lease, failed to adequately involve them in the decision-making process.
This lack of transparency has fueled distrust and anger, with residents feeling their voices have been ignored. John Quayeson, leader of the demonstrators, emphasizes that the salt resources belong to the community, not solely to the traditional leaders.
The traditional council, however, refutes these allegations, dismissing the protest as an attempt to tarnish their reputation. Nana Nkuando IV, Adontihini of the Edna Traditional Council, asserts that the protest is “an action in nullity”.
This stark contrast in perspectives underscores the communication breakdown and lack of consensus between the community and their leaders.
The situation in Elmina highlights the importance of inclusive decision-making processes, particularly when it comes to managing natural resources that directly impact local communities.
Open dialogue, consultation, and a clear framework for benefit-sharing are crucial for ensuring that development projects are not only economically viable but also socially responsible and sustainable.
